Technical Security
API security is more than authentication
A valid API key or token proves who's calling. It says nothing about what they should be allowed to see — which is where most real API vulnerabilities actually live.
“Our API requires authentication” is often treated as equivalent to “our API is secure.” It isn’t. Authentication answers one question — who is making this request — and leaves several other, frequently more exploitable questions unanswered.
Authorization is the bigger gap
Broken object-level authorization — where an authenticated user can access or modify data belonging to someone else simply by changing an ID in the request — is one of the most common and most damaging API vulnerabilities in practice. The request is perfectly authenticated; it’s authorized incorrectly, because the API never checks whether the caller actually owns the resource they’re asking for.
This is a design and implementation problem, not something a login screen or API key can prevent. It has to be checked on every endpoint that touches user-specific data, not assumed to be handled globally.
Excessive data exposure
APIs frequently return more data than the calling application actually needs, relying on the frontend to filter what’s displayed. That’s fine until someone calls the API directly instead of through the intended frontend, at which point the full, unfiltered response — including fields never meant to be exposed — becomes visible.
Rate limiting and abuse
Without meaningful rate limiting, an authenticated API can still be abused: scraped at scale, used to enumerate valid accounts or IDs, or hit hard enough to affect availability for other users. Authentication doesn’t prevent abuse from a legitimately authenticated but malicious or compromised caller.
Undocumented and forgotten endpoints
APIs accumulate endpoints over time — internal tools, deprecated versions, admin functions — that were never intended for broad access and often never got the same security review as the main product surface. These “shadow” endpoints are a common finding simply because nobody remembered to include them in scope.
The practical takeaway
A meaningful API security review has to go past “does this endpoint require a valid token” and ask, for every endpoint: what can an authenticated-but-unauthorized caller actually do here, and what does this endpoint return that it shouldn’t.
API security reviews are built specifically around these failure modes, usually alongside a broader application security review of the surrounding codebase.
Related capabilities
Related articles
A practical cloud security baseline
Not an exhaustive framework — the specific, high-leverage areas that most commonly drift from secure defaults as cloud environments grow.
AI and LLM security: the risks that actually matter right now
This is a genuinely evolving field. Here's a grounded look at the failure modes that are already well understood, rather than speculative or overstated risk.
Have a question this didn't answer?
Every engagement starts with a conversation about your specific situation, not a generic package.